Carbon Sequestration Potential of Coastal Sandy Tracts Under Rice Ecosystem

Introduction

In general in agro-ecosystems, soil receives considerable carbon inputs from a variety of sources including leaf fall, stubbles, roots and root exudates as well as through external sources including farm yard manure and compost. The semi-dry system of rice cultivation is mainly confined to tracts that depend on rains and have no supplementary irrigation facilitiesIn this semi-dry system part of the rice crop’s life cycle passes under aerobic conditions and part under anaerobic conditions. In the conventional rice cultivation practiced in irrigated areas, rice crops’ life cycle passes completely under anaerobic condition.  The amount and quality of organic carbon are crucial factors influencing soil productivity.  The endemic deficiency of organic matter in tropical sandy soils particularly those under the influence of arid and semi arid climates are a major factor contributing to their low productivity. To improve the soil organic carbon   content, organic system of nutrient management is essential to meet the nutrient requirement of the crops as well as to improve the soil organic carbon status. Soil organic matter in soils with tropical upland conditions is more difficult than in soils used for lowland rice conditions.(Sahrawat,2005).Kaboneka et al (1997) found that wheat straw,corn stover or soybean stubble were mineralized during 30 days incubation. Mineralization of green manure is slow in semidry condition hence compost or animal manures can be used as an organic source for semidry rice. Experiments were conducted to explore the possibility of recycling a common weed in the study area, Ipomea cornea as an organic source for semi dry rice.

Materials and Methods

The study area, located in east coastal area of southern peninsular India at longitude (E) 78010’- 79027’ and latitude (N) 9005’- 9056’. The green leaves of Ipomea cornea harvested from wastelands near the experimental site were chopped and mixed with cattle / poultry manures and wetted with deionized water to bring the mix to 60 per cent moisture content.  Under laboratory conditions, 5 kg of the green leaves of Ipomea cornea was composted with cattle manure and poultry manure @ 0.625, 1.25, 1.88 and 2.50 kg anaerobically for 30 days.  The matured compost was obtained at the end of composting period (30 days).  The nutrient contents of the organic materials composted are furnished in Table 1. The moisture content was maintained at 60 per cent.  Since the composting was done under anaerobic condition, the mix was not turned.  The ‘mix’ was subsequently maintained at this anaerobic condition.  A total of nine treatments were replicated for five times.  The CO2 –C evolution was measured at weekly intervals. (Bundy and Bremner, 1972). Separate containers were kept for each of the 5 sampling intervals so that once opened for CO2 –C measurement, the container could be discarded.    

 Field experiments were conducted in coastal sandy tracts with rice-rice cropping sequence under semi-dry condition.  The experimental soil (Typic Tropaquept) was alkaline in soil reaction (soil: water ratio 1:2) (pH 8.7), low in
N (Subbiah and Asija, 1956) (90 kg ha-), P (Olsen et al., 1954) (4.2 kg ha-1) and high in available K (Stanford and English, 1949)(324 kg ha-1 ) .The initial soil organic carbon content was 1.2 g kg-1.  The Ipomea cornea compost obtained from another batch of composting was applied basally (10 kg / plot) as per the treatment schedule.  The experimental plot size was 5 x 4 m2.  The design of the experiment was a randomized block design with three replicates.  The oxidizable soil organic carbon content was measured (Walkely and Black, 1934) in various growth stages of rice, tillering, panicle initiation, flowering and harvest stages.  At harvest stage, rice grain and straw yields and soil temperature were recorded.

Result and Discussion

CO2 -C   evolution

     Faster mineralization followed by a steady decline in the rate of mineralization with time.  Initially, the mineralization was faster; with increase in the period of composting, there was a steady decline in the mineralization rate.  The exponential nature of carbon mineralization from soil organic matter and added plant residues was previously reported by Vanlauwe et al., (1994).  At all sampling intervals, the lowest amount of C was mineralized from poultry manure and the highest from cattle manure.  The pattern of C mineralization from Ipomea cornea compost was similar to that of the control soil from fourth week after incubation onwards; indicating that most of the C added through compost had been mineralized within four weeks of incubation (Figure1). High rates of CO2-C evolution from the Ipomea cornea –cattle manure compost immediately after incubation was noticed. This could be due to the presence of easily decomposable organic compounds in the cattle manure as compared to less easily decomposable organic compounds in the poultry manure.  Poultry manure contains large amounts of CaCO3, struvite and other basic compounds (Bril and Solomons, 1990).  Low level of decomposition in Ipomea cornea-poultry manure compost could be attributed to high concentration of Ca and neutralization of organic acids and H+ by Ca and buffering reactions (Mahimairaja et al., 1995).

Field Experiment

 Oxidizable soil organic carbon content

  At all stages of crop growth, significant improvements in oxidizable soil organic carbon content were observed in the Ipomea cornea-poultry manure compost treatments as compared to in the control and Ipomea cornea-cattle manure compost treatments. Highest oxidizable soil organic carbon content (4.30 g C kg-1) was recorded for the Ipomea cornea-poultry manure (50% RD) compost treatment (Table 3).  Many studies have revealed a direct linear relationship between soil organic carbon storage and gross annual C input to soil (Halvin et al., 1990; Paustian et al., (1992).   With increase in the level of Poultry manure (50% RD) used in the compost, Oxidizable soil organic carbon content was increased. 

 Yield of rice

 Application of Ipomea cornea-poultry manure compost (37.5%RD) recorded higher grain (3550 kg ha-1) and straw yields (4260 kg ha-1) which was on par with the application of Ipomea cornea-poultry manure compost (50% RD) (Table 4).  This could be due to the higher amount of CaCO3 in the poultry manure.  Calcium in poultry manure exchange with Na in the soil exchange complex, thereby reduce the ill effects of Na on soil and plant.  The experimental site was alkaline in soil reaction. Despite a higher nutrient content in the poultry manure as compared to cattle manure the presence of CaCO3 in poultry manure could have favourable effect on the experimental soil. Low yield in Ipomea cornea-cattle manure compost applied plots could be due to the lesser amounts of nutrients added through cattle manure.  

Soil Temperature

 At harvest stage a negative linear correlation between soil temperature and soil organic matter status was observed (Figure 2).  As soil organic matter status increased, decrease in soil temperature was noticed.

 Conclusions

 Ipomea cornea   is one of the most rapidly spreading weeds in southern peninsular India. It is fast encroaching on cultivated lands, water reservoirs and waste lands. Significant amount of time, effort and money has been used for its eradication. Recycling of this weed Ipomea cornea could serve dual purpose of its eradication and serving as a better organic material. Ipomea cornea   could be composted with animal manures and used as manure for semidry rice cultivation. Between cattle manure and poultry manure, Ipomea cornea   composted with poultry manure recorded lower CO2 evolution,wider C:N ratio and higher rice yield and organic carbon status

 REFERENCES

Bril and Solomons, 1990. Chemical composition of animal manure: A modeling   approach.  Neth.J. Agric. Sci, 38, 333-351.    

Bundy, L.G., and Bremner, J.M. 1972. A simple titrimetric method for the determination of inorganic carbon in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 273-275.

Havlin, J.L., Kissel, D.E., Maddux, L.d., Classen, M.M and Long, J.H. 1990.  Crop         Rotation and  tillage  effects  on  soil  organic  carbon  and  nitrogen .Soil       Sci. Soc. Am. J, 54, 448-456.

Kaboneka,S.,Sabbe ,W.E.,and Mauromaustakos,A.1997.Carbon decomposition kinetics and N mineralization from corn,soyabean and wheat residues.Commun.Soil Sci.Plant Anal.28(15&16):1359-1373.

Mahimairaja, S., Bolan, N.S and Hedley. M.J. 1995.Dissolution of phosphate rock       during the composting of poultry manure: An incubation experiment. Fert. Res, 40, 93-104.

Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.L., Watanabe, F.S., and Dean, D.A. 1954.  Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by the extraction with sodium bicarbonate, U.S.D.A., Circ. 939.

Paustian, K., Parton , W. J. and Persson, J. 1992. Modeling soil organic matter in   organic amended and N fertilized long term plots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 56, 476-478.

Stanford, S and English L. 1949.  Use of flame photo meter in rapid soil test of K and Ca.  Agron J., 41 : 446-447.

Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956.  A rapid procedure for the estimation of available N in soils.  Curr. Sci., 25 : 259-260.

Vanlauwe, B., Dendooven, L. and Merckx, R.1994. Residue fractionation and      Decomposition: the significance of the active fraction .Pl. Soil, 158, 263-274.

Walkley, A and C.A. Black. 1935. An examination of methods for determining organic carbon and N in soils. J. agric. Sci, 25, 598-609.

Table 1.  Nutrient contents of manures (mg g-1 of dry matter) used in the

                Study (Mean values)

 

Nutrients

Cattle manure

Poultry manure

Ipomea cornea

N

32.5

45.0

11.6

P

7.0

16.5

3.8

K

16.0

18.5

3.1

Ca

6.5

43.0

1.2

Mg

6.5

5.5

3.8

S

3.5

5.5

2.7

Organic carbon

112

238

601

Organic matter

193

410

1036

 

 

 

Table 2.  Estimated quantity (kg ha-1) of nutrients added to the soil through the

                manures evaluated in this study

 

Treatments

Amount of cattle/poultry manure added

(tha-1)

Nutrients added through manures (kg ha-1)

 

 

 

N

P

K

Cattle manure

12.5% of RD*

 

0.625

 

20.31

 

4.38

 

10.00

25.0 % of RD

1.250

40.63

8.75

20.00

37.5% of RD

1.875

60.94

13.13

30.00

50.0% of RD

2.500

81.25

17.50

40.00

Poultry manure

12.5% of RD*

 

0.625

 

28.13

 

10.31

 

11.56

25.0 % of RD

1.250

56.25

20.63

23.13

37.5% of RD

1.875

84.38

30.94

34.69

50.0% of RD

2.500

112.50

41.25

46.25

 

(*RD -Recommended dose-5t ha-1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 3 . Oxidizable soil organic carbon in crop growing period (g kg-1 soil)

 

Treatments

Tillering

Panicle Initiation

Flowering

Harvest

Cattle manure

12.5% of RD

 

1.4

 

1.6

 

1.7

 

1.9

25.0 % of RD

1.7

2.0

2.2

2.5

37.5% of RD

1.9

2.3

2.6

3.0

50.0% of RD

2.3

2.5

2.8

3.1

Poultry manure

12.5% of RD

 

1.6

 

2.0

 

2.2

 

2.5

25.0 % of RD

2.1

2.3

2.6

3.2

37.5% of RD

2.5

2.7

2.9

3.4

50.0% of RD

2.8

3.3

3.6

4.3

 

 

 

Table  4  .  Yield (Kg ha-1) as influenced by the incorporation of organics

 

Treatments

Grain

Straw

Cattle manure

12.5% of RD

 

2320

 

2784

25.0 % of RD

2574

3063

37.5% of RD

3265

3918

50.0% of RD

3097

3685

Poultry manure

12.5% of RD

 

2725

 

3270

25.0 % of RD

3287

3912

37.5% of RD

3550

4260

50.0% of RD

3425

4110

SEd

137

164

CD(P:0.05)

325

389

Table.5 Cumulative CO2-C mineralization (mg kg-1) in the compost

 

(i) Ipomea cornea – cattle manure compost

 

 

Treatments

Incubation intervals (weeks)

IC-CM

1

2

3

4

5

12.5% RD

300

650

810

790

720

25.0 % RD

345

687

835

797

754

37.5%  RD

373

692

869

804

805

50.0%  RD

410

724

925

910

831

SEd

3.86

5.09

2.69

2.39

1.61

CD(P=0.05)

9.45

12.47

6.58

5.85

3.94

Soil

1.0

1.2

1.9

1.6

1.5

 

  (ii) Ipomea cornea – poultry manure compost

 

Treatments

Incubation intervals (weeks)

IC-PM

1

2

3

4

5

12.5%  RD

200

390

454

442

420

25.0 % RD

227

415

475

457

443

37.5%  RD

254

452

517

489

481

50.0%  RD

273

469

534

510

528

SEd

0.95

0.93

0.81

1.99

3.45

CD(P=0.05)

2.33

2.28

1.99

4.88

8.45

Soil

1.00

1.20

1.90

1.60

1.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R.K.Kaleeswari a and Richard Bell b

a Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, TamilNadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, TamilNadu, India

b Murdoch University,90 South Street,Murdoch.Perth,Western Australia 6150

Recommended Reading

This entry was posted in Plants and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>